Clipping:The black list reaffirmed

19C Clippings
	Clippings in 1853 Clippings in 1854 Clippings in 1855 Clippings in 1856 Clippings in 1857 Clippings in 1858 Clippings in 1859 Clippings in 1860 Clippings in 1861 Clippings in 1862 Clippings in 1863 Clippings in 1864 Clippings in 1865 Clippings in 1866 Clippings in 1867 Clippings in 1868 Clippings in 1869 Clippings in 1870 Clippings in 1871 Clippings in 1872 Clippings in 1873 Clippings in 1874 Clippings in 1875 Clippings in 1876 Clippings in 1877 Clippings in 1878 Clippings in 1879 Clippings in 1880 Clippings in 1881 Clippings in 1882 Clippings in 1883 Clippings in 1884 Clippings in 1885 Clippings in 1886 Clippings in 1887 Clippings in 1888 Clippings in 1889 Clippings in 1890
	Add a Clipping

Date	Saturday, December 10, 1881
Text	[reporting the NL meeting of 12/9/1881] The subject of the “black list” was then brought up on motion by Mr. Winship, of Providence. He stated that his Club had felt very sore over the placing of Gross upon that list, and were particularly anxious about securing his removal. That player had shown evidence intention of reforming along in the month of June last season, and it was very unjust to thus handicap him. Then followed a most heated discussion, which lasted for some time. Mr. Winship was considerably enlightened as to the actions of Gross, and greatly to his surprise ascertained that the case had been most carefully covered up by the players and others interested. The delegates insisted that if one mas was placed on [sic: probably should be 'removed from'] the black list they all should be, and if that was done, why the reform intended to have been wrought by the enactment would have been lost. Finally it was unanimously decided to reaffirm the action of the Saratoga meeting, leaving the list the same.
Source	Cincinnati Enquirer
Tags
Warning
Comment	Edit with form to add a comment
Query	Edit with form to add a query
Submitted by	Richard Hershberger
Origin	Initial Hershberger Clippings

Comments