Clipping:Discontent in Pittsburgh over the Barkley and McKnight matters

From Protoball
Revision as of 19:05, 29 February 2020 by Dave (talk | contribs) (Hershberger Clippings Import)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
19C Clippings
Scroll.png


Add a Clipping
Date Wednesday, March 24, 1886
Text

If the Alleghenies has but joined the League, all the present contention about that multitudinous official, McKnight, might have been avoided. Has there been any deception in the matter? Was Mr. McKnight entrusted with so many offices as an inducement to prevent the Allghenies from joining the League? Why not leave the Association which has treated the Alleghenies so badly in their treatment of Mr. McKnight, and run the club independently? Or, is the Association such an autocratic affair that the rule “once a subject always a subject” applies? Without Barkley and McKnight what will the Alleghenies do, anyway?

Source Pittsburgh Commercial Gazette
Comment Edit with form to add a comment
Query Edit with form to add a query
Submitted by Richard Hershberger
Origin Initial Hershberger Clippings

Comments

<comments voting="Plus" />