Reconsidering Elysian Fields -- October 2022: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In October, not least because of revealing research by SABR's Jonathan Popovich, Origins and 19th Century communities were moved to revisit what we know -- and what we want to learn -- about ballplaying at New Jersey's Elysian Fields in the 1840s and later. This section of Protoball.org reflects an experiment. Could a loosely organized series of emails and some short-term research probes, pursued in October and November of that year, be helpful in sketching the current state of knowledge about EF and revealing research priorities? . It is retained (and perhaps updated here later) as a possible introduction on the current knowledge about the Elysian Fields and its role in base ball history. | |||
Material on these topics are accumulated here: | |||
'''(1) About the Elysian Fields ('EF')''' | |||
'''(2) Available Research Resources about Elysian Fields''' | |||
'''(3) Discussion Thread A: Did EF Change Base Ball? ''' | |||
'''(4) Discussion Thread B: On ''' | |||
''' Available Playing Space in the 1840s and 1850s''' | |||
'''(5) Other Issues?''' | |||
<br> | |||
==== | |||
==== | |||
Irwin Chusid and Jon Popovich have expressed strong interest in writing further about Elysian Fields, and will participate in this limited-term discussion. For a riveting presentation on Elysian Fields from a base ball researcher's point of view, see Irwin and Jonathan's recent Youtube presentation at: <br><div class="I_ZkbNhI D_FY W_6D6F" data-test-id="message-view-body"><div class="msg-body P_wpofO mq_AS" data-test-id="message-view-body-content"><div class="jb_0 X_6MGW N_6Fd5"><div id="yiv3120532064"><div dir="ltr"><div class="yiv3120532064WordSection1">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwJGWeWDHPA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwJGWeWDHPA] | |||
Line 26: | Line 48: | ||
<span style="text-decoration: underline;">Note:</span> By accident, an active email discussion among a smaller group broke out on September 29. Here are the 13 postings so far : we will try to expand the conversation to a larger group. | <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Note:</span> By accident, an active email discussion among a smaller group broke out on September 29. Here are the 13 postings so far : we will try to expand the conversation to a larger group. | ||
<p style="font-weight: 400; text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;" >'''Initial Protoball Thread on EF and the Lack of Manhattan Playing Space (13 Posts)'''</span><br></p> | <p style="font-weight: 400; text-align: center;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;">'''Initial Protoball Thread on EF and the Lack of Manhattan Playing Space (13 Posts)'''</span><br></p> | ||
<p style="font-weight: 400;"><br></p> | <p style="font-weight: 400;"><br></p> | ||
<div style="font-weight: 400;"><div><div><div><div>''1) Bruce Allardice, 9/2922''<br></div> | <div style="font-weight: 400;"><div><div><div><div>''1) Bruce Allardice, 9/2922''<br></div> | ||
<div><div><div><div><div>Irwin, Jon:<br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div> | <div><div><div><div><div>Irwin, Jon:<br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div> | ||
<div><div><div><div><div><div>A question | <div><div><div><div><div><div>A question came up tonight in a conversation with Larry McCray. It is admitted that part of early baseball's attractiveness in NYC was the fact that because of the foul rule it could be played in smaller, more available spaces than alternate bat ball games such as cricket and town ball, which featured 360 degree fields. In fact this has been given as one reason early NYC baseball clubs played their games at Elysian Fields.</div> | ||
<div>The question is: was Manhattan Island really devoid of open space for baseball in the 1840s and 1850s? Or was it instead because the open space was so far north of the city center that it was easier to take the ferry across the Hudson to Elysian Fields?</div> | <div>The question is: was Manhattan Island really devoid of open space for baseball in the 1840s and 1850s? Or was it instead because the open space was so far north of the city center that it was easier to take the ferry across the Hudson to Elysian Fields?</div> | ||
<div>I'm informed that you may be doing a book project on Elysian Fields. Sounds great. Let me know if and how I can give any EF project of yours free publicity in the Origins of Baseball Newsletter.</div> | <div>I'm informed that you may be doing a book project on Elysian Fields. Sounds great. Let me know if and how I can give any EF project of yours free publicity in the Origins of Baseball Newsletter.</div> | ||
Line 128: | Line 150: | ||
<div>Red House, 105th/106th Sts. and 1st Ave. | <div>Red House, 105th/106th Sts. and 1st Ave. | ||
Champion grounds (Columbia College) at 49th St. | Champion grounds (Columbia College) at 49th St. and 5th Ave</div> | ||
<div><br></div> | <div><br></div> | ||
<div>Obviously, these venues had alternate names.<br></div> | <div>Obviously, these venues had alternate names.<br></div> | ||
Line 162: | Line 184: | ||
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwJGWeWDHPA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwJGWeWDHPA]<p><br></p> | [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwJGWeWDHPA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwJGWeWDHPA]<p><br></p> | ||
<p> [] Thorn, John, , "The Cauldron of Baseball,'Baseball in the the Garden of Eden, (Simon and Shuster, 2011, pages 85-104.<br></p> | <p> [] Thorn, John, , "The Cauldron of Baseball,'Baseball in the the Garden of Eden, (Simon and Shuster, 2011, pages 85-104.<br></p> | ||
<p><br></p> | <p><br></p> | ||
<p>Got another favorite source? Let Larry know. Would it be helpful to assemble an EF bibliography for this list? Let him know.</p> | <p>Got another favorite source? Let Larry know. Would it be helpful to assemble an EF bibliography for this list? Let him know.</p> |
Latest revision as of 15:57, 31 October 2022
In October, not least because of revealing research by SABR's Jonathan Popovich, Origins and 19th Century communities were moved to revisit what we know -- and what we want to learn -- about ballplaying at New Jersey's Elysian Fields in the 1840s and later. This section of Protoball.org reflects an experiment. Could a loosely organized series of emails and some short-term research probes, pursued in October and November of that year, be helpful in sketching the current state of knowledge about EF and revealing research priorities? . It is retained (and perhaps updated here later) as a possible introduction on the current knowledge about the Elysian Fields and its role in base ball history.
Material on these topics are accumulated here:
(1) About the Elysian Fields ('EF')
(2) Available Research Resources about Elysian Fields
(3) Discussion Thread A: Did EF Change Base Ball?
(4) Discussion Thread B: On
Available Playing Space in the 1840s and 1850s
(5) Other Issues?
==
==
Irwin Chusid and Jon Popovich have expressed strong interest in writing further about Elysian Fields, and will participate in this limited-term discussion. For a riveting presentation on Elysian Fields from a base ball researcher's point of view, see Irwin and Jonathan's recent Youtube presentation at:
[] A. Aspects of the role of Elysian Fields that we wish we knew more about. Possible example: what does EF tell us about the role of unavailable local playing grounds in the diffusion of base ball?
[] B. Favorite sources of existing coverage of ballplaying at Elysian Fields for those who want to read up (or refresh their grasp) of current knowledge on Elysian Fields.
[] C. Other factors ("threads") that we haven't thought of at this point.
While the main fun may well be in the e-mail exchanges that ensue, Protoball will import material from the discussion on this page for the benefit of future Origins researchers.
-- Larry McCray, 9/30/2022
Note: By accident, an active email discussion among a smaller group broke out on September 29. Here are the 13 postings so far : we will try to expand the conversation to a larger group.
Initial Protoball Thread on EF and the Lack of Manhattan Playing Space (13 Posts)
Our projected book is about the totality of the EF, with base ball one of many aspects to be addressed. My sense of Protoball's involvement is to aggregate facts (journalistic and visual) about base ball, cricket, and other ball games being played at the EF, but not to delve into the history of the parkland, which pre-dates what we know as base ball. The fields were developed by Col. John Stevens as a public amusement area in the late 1820s and early 1830s. At the time of Col. Stevens' death in 1838, I suspect he had never heard of base ball.
Irwin
8.01 Irwin Chusid 10/3
- Referencing Tom's comment above — but did that apply in 1843–1846 when Hoboken became the go-to destination for countless NYC teams? Clearance for Central Park began around 1857, by which time "upper" Manhattan was being developed. Perhaps by that point there were more open spaces than there had been twenty years earlier. Brooklyn, by then, also offered more available grounds. In the 1860s, the opening of the Union and Capitoline grounds drew teams away from Hoboken. After the Civil War, the Elysian Fields went into decline and fewer NY-based teams played there.
Picnic Season, 1873: This early summer number of the popular illustrated weekly Daily Graphic provides a handy key to New York’s garden spots for excursions—even after the opening of Central Park. Steamboat excursions up the Hudson or ferry rides across it had been popular for decades. By 1873 the Elysian Fields of Hoboken were in decline as commercial interests had gobbled up much of the former workingman’s paradise. But now he had Fort Lee and good old Jones’ Wood, the spot rejected as the site of Central Park but still popular for German turnvereins, Caledonian games, and good rowdy fun of the sort depicted here by Jules Tavernier. The Daily Graphic was one of many illustrated weeklies popular at the time—Harper’s Weekly, Leslie’s, Police Gazette and more—but it was notable for its focus on city affairs and historic for its launch in 1880 of photomechanical engraving, the halftone process by which photographs might be reproduced. Within twenty years engraving would go the way of the dodo.
Yorkville was also the site of a baseball grounds, cited in Peverelly as being, in 1859, at Eighty-first street and Second avenue.
The last, I promise. I sent this to the 19cbb list on Sept 6, 2004, with a header of Pre-1871 NYC, Brooklyn, Philadelphia, and NJ Ball Grounds:
===
===
Learning More about Elysian Fields: Some Favorite Starting Points
[] Gilbert, Thomas, How Baseball Happened (David R. Godine, Boston, 2020) pages 81-102.
[] Mann, William A., "Elysian Fields of Hoboken, New Jersey", Base Ball, vol. 1, no. 1, Spring 2007, pp 78. - 102.
[] Popovich, Jonathan and Irwin Chusid, 2022 webinar on Elysian Fields,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwJGWeWDHPA [] Thorn, John, , "The Cauldron of Baseball,'Baseball in the the Garden of Eden, (Simon and Shuster, 2011, pages 85-104.
Got another favorite source? Let Larry know. Would it be helpful to assemble an EF bibliography for this list? Let him know.
=====================================================
Added 10/2022:
For comment and correction
L. McCray, 10/25
Version1.0,10/22/2022
As of October 2022, Protoball.org's PrePro Database includes about 200 contributed game accounts for New Jersey's Elysian Fields. A not-very thorough 3-hour/4-hour review of these data points leads to these rough impressions:
[] From late 1845 to 1853, most games were intramural contests among the Knickerbockers; over 100 such games are entered. I see only six games involving other clubs before 1853, two of which were intermural games for other clubs (Gothams in 1845, NYBBC in 1845). For this period, I see only 4 interclub games at EF, three in 1845-6 and one in in 1851 (K's v. Gothams).
Starting in 1853, the majority (roughly 90%) of 80 reported games) are interclub games.
[] Overall, 30 or 31 different clubs played at EF.
For interclub matches, the Eagle Club played in 34 of the listed games against 10 different opponents, starting in 1854. The Gotham/Washington/NYBBC club/clubs appeared in 25 interclub matches against 4 clubs from 1845 to 1861. The Knickerbocker Club appears in 22 interclub matches from 1845 to its last in August 1859. The Empire Club appears in 18 matches starting in 1854. The Mutual Club appears in 14 matches from 1858. Other matches featured the Eckford (9 games), the Excelsior (8), and the Alpine 9 (6) clubs (6). One account reported on two teams from a fire company.
[] Now. Aren't the Eckford (9 matches) , Excelsiors (8 matches) and Atlantic (two matches) and Enterprise (2 matches) all from Brooklyn? -- I think they only played non-Brooklyn opponents at EF. Maybe they had been invited by Manhattan club hosts? Are there any other distant visitors? Well, The Albany Knickerbockers do appear once (1864). A Hoboken club is seen twice, playing the Ecks and the Eagles in 1859.
[] A total of23 EF matches appear for 1860, 14 for 1861, and only 8 after that, the last in 1864. EF may have lost its tasted for crowds of fans in the later 1860s?
[] We have no reported matches for 1852, after only 6 in 1851. Cholera? Protoball data fumble? Other? Covid19?
Open issues:
Reminder: 'This is all just bean-counting -- it is not science. We have no reason to believe that matches entered in PBall are a representative sample of the matches actually played.
[] Would won-loss data be useful for our purposes? Not sure why it would.
[] Did other writers' write summaries that better meet our needs on this subject? (Feel free to suggest --or to perform --such!)
Larry M