1872.6

From Protoball
Revision as of 08:12, 20 May 2022 by Larry (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Chronology Entry |Year=1872 |Year Suffix= |Year Number=6 |Headline=Umpiring Evolves As A Profession: Certification, Bipartisan Pay |Salience=2 |Tags=Baseball Professionalis...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Chronologies
Scroll.png

Prominent Milestones

Misc BB Firsts
Add a Misc BB First

About the Chronology
Tom Altherr Dedication

Add a Chronology Entry
Open Queries
Open Numbers
Most Aged

Umpiring Evolves As A Profession: Certification, Bipartisan Pay

Salience Noteworthy
Tags Baseball Professionalism, Business of Baseball
City/State/Country: New York, NY, United States
Game Base Ball
Immediacy of Report Contemporary
Age of Players Adult
Text

"Having pointed out the evil of indiscriminate selection of umpires, we will now suggest a remedy.

And this is the appointment of certain persons by the annual convention to act as umpires, and who will receive a certain sum -- say $10 and their traveling expenses -- for every game they umpire . . . .

The contending clubs can each pay a moiety of the expenses, and it will fall heavily n neither." 

 

Sources

New York Sunday Dispatch, May 19, 1872.

Comment

From Richard Hershberger, 150 years ago in baseball, May 19, 2022.

"The umpire question. Umpire selection in the early days was very informal. Sometimes arrangements would be made ahead of time, but even for important matches it was not unknown for the two captains to pick a guy out from the crowd. It would usually be someone they both knew, so it wasn't totally random, but if he had not shown up, they would have picked someone else.

Here in 1872 this system is wearing thin. This is the professional era and the stakes are higher. In today's excerpt, we see a radical suggestion: pay the guy. This will start happening soon. It will help, but won't solve the problem entirely. There still is the matter of finding someone both captains agree upon. The next decade or so will see endless overly elaborate schemes to come up with an equitable system. The underlying problem is that even once everyone agrees the umpire needs to be paid, no one wants to pay enough for this to be a full-time job. Employing part-timers means they are using local guys, with all this entails. The bickering will be endless. Or at least it will be until they finally bite the bullet and go with a full-time umpire corps employed by the league. That won't be until the 1880s. Here in 1872, the NA doesn't even have a league structure to run an umpire corps, much less the operating funds.

The article here suggests $10 per game. This won't be enough to persuade capable men to put up with grief for two hours. The going rate will settle in at $15. That is roughly equivalent to $300 to $400 in today's money."

Edit with form to add a comment
Query

What is a good general history of umpiring? 

Edit with form to add a query
Source Image
Paying umpires 1872.jpg
Submitted by Richard Hershberger
Submission Note FB Posting of 5/19/2022



Comments

<comments voting="Plus" />