1815.4: Difference between revisions
(Convert Is in Main Chronology to Salience) |
Bsallardice (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Chronology Entry | {{Chronology Entry | ||
|Year=1815 | |||
|Year Suffix= | |||
|Year Number=4 | |||
|Headline=Six-Hour "Wicket" Match Played in Canada | |Headline=Six-Hour "Wicket" Match Played in Canada | ||
|Salience=2 | |Salience=2 | ||
|Location=Canada | |Location=Canada | ||
|Country= | |||
|Coordinates= | |||
|State= | |||
|City= | |||
|Modern Address= | |||
|Game=Cricket | |Game=Cricket | ||
|Text=<p>"On the 29<sup>th</sup> May, a grant [sic] Match of Wicket was played at Chippawa, Upper Canada, by 22 English ship wrights, for a stake of 150 dollars. | |Immediacy of Report= | ||
<p>"The winners challenge any eleven gentlemen in the state of New York, for any sum they may wish to play for. | |Holiday= | ||
<p>< | |Notables= | ||
|Text=<p>"On the 29<sup>th</sup> May, a grant [sic] Match of Wicket was played at Chippawa, Upper Canada, by 22 English ship wrights, for a stake of 150 dollars. The parties were distinguished by the Pueetergushene and the Chippawa party. The game was won in 56 runs by the former. It continued 6 hours.</p> | |||
<p>"The winners challenge any eleven gentlemen in the state of New York, for any sum they may wish to play for. The game was succeeded by a supper in honor of King Charles, and the evening in spent [sic] with great hilarity."</p> | |||
<p><em>Mechanics' Gazette and Merchants' Daily Advertiser,</em> June 9,1815, reprinting from the <em>Buffalo</em> <em>Gazette.</em> Provided by Richard Hershberger, 7/30/2007. <strong>Note:</strong> It seems unusual for Englishmen to be playing wicket, and for wicket to field 11-man teams. Could this be a cricket match reported as wicket? Is it clear why a Buffalo NY newspaper would report on a match in "Upper Canada," or whereever Chippawa is? Do we know what a "grant match" is? A typo for "grand match," probably?</p> | |||
|Sources= | |||
|Warning= | |||
|Comment=<p>Upper Canada is modern Ontario, and Chippewa is just across the Niagara River from New York and Buffalo. [ba]</p> | |||
|Query= | |||
|Source Image= | |||
|External Number= | |||
|Submitted by= | |||
|Submission Note= | |||
|Reviewed=Yes | |||
|Has Supplemental Text=No | |||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 15:35, 3 July 2022
Prominent Milestones |
Misc BB Firsts |
Add a Misc BB First |
About the Chronology |
Tom Altherr Dedication |
Add a Chronology Entry |
Open Queries |
Open Numbers |
Most Aged |
Six-Hour "Wicket" Match Played in Canada
Salience | Noteworthy |
---|---|
Tags | |
Location | CanadaCanada |
City/State/Country: | [[]] |
Modern Address | |
Game | CricketCricket |
Immediacy of Report | |
Age of Players | |
Holiday | |
Notables | |
Text | "On the 29th May, a grant [sic] Match of Wicket was played at Chippawa, Upper Canada, by 22 English ship wrights, for a stake of 150 dollars. The parties were distinguished by the Pueetergushene and the Chippawa party. The game was won in 56 runs by the former. It continued 6 hours. "The winners challenge any eleven gentlemen in the state of New York, for any sum they may wish to play for. The game was succeeded by a supper in honor of King Charles, and the evening in spent [sic] with great hilarity." Mechanics' Gazette and Merchants' Daily Advertiser, June 9,1815, reprinting from the Buffalo Gazette. Provided by Richard Hershberger, 7/30/2007. Note: It seems unusual for Englishmen to be playing wicket, and for wicket to field 11-man teams. Could this be a cricket match reported as wicket? Is it clear why a Buffalo NY newspaper would report on a match in "Upper Canada," or whereever Chippawa is? Do we know what a "grant match" is? A typo for "grand match," probably? |
Sources | |
Warning | |
Comment | Upper Canada is modern Ontario, and Chippewa is just across the Niagara River from New York and Buffalo. [ba] Edit with form to add a comment |
Query | Edit with form to add a query |
Source Image | [[Image:|left|thumb]] |
External Number | |
Submitted by | |
Submission Note | |
Has Supplemental Text |
Comments
<comments voting="Plus" />